|
What is this Indicator, and Why is it Importants?
Fragmentation of ecosystems into small patches can reduce
habitat for wildlife species that require larger, connected
patches. It can hinder the movement of some species and introduce
predators, parasites, and competitors associated with different
land uses. Fragmentation can also alter the frequency and
extent of fire and affect the dispersal and regeneration of
plants. Suburban and urban development, farmlands, roads,
railroads, powerline corridors, and other land uses cause
various kinds and degrees of fragmentation.
Species that require large, unbroken expanses of habitat
are often most sensitive to the effects of fragmentation.
In some cases, the effects of fragmentation on sensitive species
are a direct result of changes in the size and arrangement
of suitable habitats across the landscape. In others, impacts
are due mainly to more frequent interactions of species with
humans, vehicles, or predators, or to other factors associated
with an intruding land use.
People also react to changing landscapes. Areas that were
primarily forest, grasslands, or shrublands but are now fragmented
by other uses or bisected by roads provide a very different
level of solitude and visual attraction. Likewise, the character
of farm landscapes and communities changes radically when
they are broken up by suburban development.
Human activity can also create landscapes that are less varied
than the landscapes historically experienced by native species.
Particularly in the West, natural fires create a patchy landscape,
where forest and grasslands are intermingled in a mosaic that
supports many different species. Fire suppression and the
large fires that result after long periods of suppression
can create broad expanses of very similar vegetation, with
negative effects on species that thrive on the formerly varied
landscape.
Landscape patterns affect people and other species in different
ways and at different geographic scales. Some species are
very sensitive to fragmentation, while others are more tolerant.
Some effects, such as the changes that occur in farming communities
undergoing suburbanization, operate at a county level, while
other effects, such as those affecting forest birds, involve
distances measured in feet or yards. The magnitude of fragmentation
and its context are also important. A single incursion may
not cause significant effects, but many such changes taken
together may have a larger impact. Similarly, a modest amount
of fragmentation in an abundant habitat may not be significant,
but the same amount of fragmentation in a rare habitat may
be cause for concern.
Why Can't This Indicator Be Reported At This Time?
There are clear and obvious linkages between landscape patterns,
the kinds of plants and animals that thrive in a region, and
the ways in which people use the land. However, there are
many different ways to characterize these patterns and the
ways in which they are changing, and scientists do not agree
on a single best measure. Additional work is necessary
to select the specific features that should be measured, the
geographic scale at which they should be monitored, and how
they should be reported and interpreted.
This report includes measures of fragmentation or landscape pattern for grasslands
and shrublands, farmlands, forests,
and urban and suburban areas. Although
some of these indicators require additional research, it is clear that there
is more agreement among scientists on how to measure landscape pattern for
specific ecosystem types than there is for an overall national measure.
What Steps Are Necessary To Achieve Reliable National
Coverage? This is an area of active scientific investigation.
Many possible indicators are being evaluated to determine
which ones, or which combinations, provide the best view of
the important changes that are occurring in the American landscape.
|