The Indicator
This indicator presents the percentage of U.S. cropland (minus pastures, but
including Conservation Reserve Program [CRP] acreage) in each of three categories
of land condition (least prone, moderately prone, and most prone to erosion),
based on both inherent soil properties and management practices, for 1982, 1992,
and 1997, for both wind and water erosion. Also, those lands most prone to wind
and water erosion are mapped.
Soil erosion is affected both by the inherent properties of the soil, landscape,
and region (e.g., slope, soil type, rainfall) and by management factors that
may change more rapidly (specifically, the use of terracing, wind barriers,
and the type, amount, and duration of vegetative cover). Soils with higher inherent
likelihood of eroding and with high vulnerability due to the way they are managed
are likely to erode the most. (Enrollment of these acres into the CRP, which
requires steps toward reducing erosion (e.g., planting perennial grasses), will
lead to improvement of this indicator.) Conversely, soils with low inherent
likelihood of eroding and low vulnerability because of good management are likely
to erode least.
Categories for this indicator were developed using parameters measured for
use in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ).
These equations were developed to predict long-term average erosion based on
measurements of the inherent soil and plot features and management and surface
treatment factors. For water erosion (USLE), inherent soil and plot factors
are R, rainfall and runoff; K, soil erodibility; and L and S, topographic factors
related to slope steepness and length of slope. Management and surface treatment
factors included C, cover management, which essentially measures whether and
how much vegetative cover is left on the soil surface, and P, support practice
factor, which measures whether there are features such as terraces. The equation
form is A (annual soil erosion per unit area) = C*P*R*K*L*S. For wind, the inherent
soil and plot factors are I, soil erodibility index, and C, climatic factor.
Management and surface treatment factors are K, ridge roughness; L, unsheltered
distance along the prevailing wind direction; and V, vegetative cover. Wind
erosion, E (annual soil erosion per unit area), is a function of I, K, C, L,
and V (see references for more details).
This report uses the underlying principles of these equations to identify cropland
area with combinations of inherent soil properties and management practices
that are likely to erode most and least. Though inherent soil properties change
slowly or not at all, management practices can significantly reduce erosion.
Thus, reductions in acreage with high propensity to erode result primarily from
application of management practices that reduce erosion, including removal of
acreage from cultivation, such as CRP.
Areas with the least susceptibility to both wind and water erosion (least
prone) are generally those with a predicted erosion rate of less than
1 ton per acre per year. Areas with the greatest susceptibility to erosion (most
prone) are those with a predicted erosion rate of 3 tons per acre or more.
Areas with moderate susceptibility to erosion have predicted values between
about 1 and 3 tons per acre per year.
Standard application of both USLE and WEQ uses the equations to predict total
erosion, in tons per acre. In this report, we have chosen not to take this last
step in the process. We do so because we believe taking this step overstates
actual erosion, as the USLE does not account for deposition, only the initiation
of soil movement. Some soil particles move only very short distances, and when
erosion is reported in units of tons per acre there is a strong
implication (and sometimes an explicit statement) that these tons of soil are
lost from the farm field.
The WEQ estimates how much eroding soil leaves the downwind edge of the field,
in tons per acre per year.
The Data
Data Source: Acreage estimates for lands in each of the three categories
were developed using data provided by USDAs Natural Resources Conservation
Service, from the National Resources Inventory (NRI). For information on NRI methods,
applicability of results, and access to information, see the technical
note for Total Cropland.
References
Bondy, E., Lyles, L., and Hayes, W.A. 1980. Computing soil erosion by periods
using wind energy distribution. Jour. Soil and Water Conserv. 35(4):173176.
Skidmore, E.L., and N.P. Woodruff. 1968. Wind erosion forces in the United
States and their use in predicting soil loss. Agriculture Handbook No. 346.
Woodruff, N.P., and Siddoway, F.H. 1965. A wind erosion equation. Soil Sci.
Soc. Amer. Proc. 29(5):602608.
|