The Indicator
Coastal Ocean: For each year, the average chlorophyll-a (referred to
here as chlorophyll) concentration (parts per billion, or ppb) for the season
with the highest average is reported; this is referred to as the seasonal
mean maximum. Data are reported for each region in a band of coastal water
extending 25 miles from the shoreline. This boundary was chosen so the index
would be more sensitive to changes in nutrients input from terrestrial sources
than influences from the deep sea. Estuaries: It is proposed to report
the percentage of U.S. estuary area that has seasonal mean maximum chlorophyll
values below 5 ppb, from 5 to 20 ppb, and above 20 ppb.
The Data
Coastal Ocean: Data from the National Aeronautical and Space Administrations
(NASA) Sea viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS; see http://seawifs.gsfc.nasa.gov)
were analyzed for the nine ocean regions by the National Ocean Service, National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Water leaving radiance
(reflectance, or light reflected from the sea surface) is used to estimate chlorophyll
concentrations at the surface using a series of assumptions accepted by the
scientific community. The data utilized for this analysis are termed level
3. In all cases, seasonal maxima were determined for strips of water 25
miles wide along the coast. These strips were analyzed using square pixels 6
miles on a side. Note that earlier data from the Coastal Zone Color Scanner
are available; however, they are not directly comparable to the SeaWiFS data.
The Data Gap
Coastal Ocean: Algorithms used to translate water leaving radiance into
chlorophyll concentration currently provide only rough estimates of concentration
in those waters where concentrations of suspended sediments and colored dissolved
organic matter are high; for example, near-shore waters influenced by surface
and groundwater discharges, coastal erosion, and sediment resuspension. A major
research effort is currently under way to improve coastal algorithms. Spatial
resolution is also a problem. The data presented here are based on a fairly
coarse scale (6-mile resolution), but data with 10 times more resolution will
soon be available. In order to provide more reliable estimates, satellite data
need to be analyzed together with field (in situ measurements) data that typically
are not available electronically and, therefore, not easily accessible. In addition,
techniques for integrating the two types of data are needed. Currently, data
showing relative changes in chlorophyll within a region can be trusted; however,
data showing actual concentrations for any given region may be off by a factor
of two. Thus, unless differences are large, meaningful comparisons between regions
are not yet possible.
Estuaries: As discussed in the text, no regularly reported data are
available for this portion of the indicator. Data from NOAAs National
Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment (see http://spo.nos.noaa.gov/projects/cads/nees/Eutro_Report.pdf)
suggest that 40 percent of the area of major estuaries has high
chlorophyll levels (>20 ppb), with another 46 percent having moderate
levels (520 ppb). At the extremes, the north and south Atlantic
regions had mostly low-to-moderate levels, while three-quarters of the estuary
area in the mid-Atlantic had high chlorophyll levels. These results are not
based on quantitative data analysis but on the knowledge of scientists familiar
with the estuaries in each region. Monitoring data do exist for some estuaries,
but need to be assembled into a uniform, national database, and new programs
would be required for the remaining estuaries. A combination of aircraft and
satellite remote-sensing and in situ measurements will be required to determine
the estuarine component of this indicator.
|