The Indicator
For the purposes of this analysis, harmful algal blooms (HABs) are defined
as (1) an increase in the abundance of species that are known to produce toxins
harmful to marine animals or humans (see Table 2); (2) the occurrence of lesions
or mass mortalities of marine animals caused by HAB species; and (3) the occurrence
of human pathologies caused by HAB species. A single event counts only once
toward the relative intensity scale, even if it produces multiple impacts (e.g.,
an increase in the abundance of a HAB species that causes mass mortalities and
an increased human health risk will be counted as a single event).
| Table 2. Harmful Algal Species: By
Region and Toxic Effect |
| Region |
Effect |
Species |
| Northeast |
Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Fish kills Shellfish
mortality |
Alexandrium tamarense Gymnodinium mikimotoi Aurococcus
anophagefferens |
| Southeast |
Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning (NSP) Fish kills, Human
health |
Gymnodinium breve Pfiesteria piscicida |
| Gulf of Mexico |
Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning (NSP) Ciguatera Fish
Poisoning (CFP) Amnesic Shellfish Poisoning (ASP) |
Gymnodinium breve Gambierdiscus toxicus Pseudo-nitzschia
spp. |
| West Coast |
Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP) Amnesic Shellfish
Poisoning (ASP) Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) |
Alexandrium catenella Pseudo-nitzschia spp. Dinophysis
spp. |
| Note: PSP, NSP, CFP, ASP, and DSP all cause
human health problems. |
There are approximately 5000 species of microalgae in the world. Of these,
about 100 are toxic. The scientific community refers to the phenomenon that
cause these events as HABs, recognizing that HAB species represent a broad spectrum
of taxa (e.g., dinoflagellates, diatoms, cyanobacteria) and trophic levels (e.g.,
autotrophic, heterotrophic, mixotrophic) and that many HAB species cause problems
at low cell densities (i.e., a visible bloom is not necessarily required for
a HAB event to occur). A second group of problematic algal blooms is recognized:
those that cause problems such as oxygen depletion, habitat loss, starvation,
or respiratory or reproductive failure in marine animals by virtue of their
high abundance or biomass. These issues are addressed to some extent in other
indicators.
Although definitive scientific evidence is lacking, HAB events appear to be
increasing in number, extent, and severity (see National Assessment of Harmful
Algal Blooms in US Waters, http://www.habhrca.noaa.gov/FinalHABreport.pdf).
Rapid increases in the number of people living, working, and playing in the
coastal zone have increased the input of nutrients to coastal waters, and HAB
events may be occurring more frequently as a consequence. In addition, increases
in shipping (and the inadvertent transport of non-native species of algae in
ballast water) and the transport of shellfish between regions and continents
may be increasing the frequency of HAB events by introducing new HAB species
to U.S. coastal waters, or moving them to new locations within the United States.
A growing human population also increases the demand for food from coastal waters
in the form of wild and cultured fish and shellfish. The aquaculture industry
is threatened by HAB events and may contribute to their increase.
The Data Gap
Most harmful algal events, such as fish kills, are typically identified after
the event occurred or when it is well under way. Systematic monitoring programs
that (1) quantify the abundance of harmful algal species, (2) quantify the concentrations
of biotoxins or establish unequivocal causal relations between HAB species and
mortality events, or (3) quantify increases in human health risks are rare.
Consequently, the data required to calculate this index on regional or national
scales do not exist.
Although efforts to monitor and report these events are increasing nationwide,
there is no standard measure of HABs. This is largely because of the heterogeneous
nature of HABs (in terms of taxonomy, nutrition, the conditions under which
they become toxic, the kinds of toxins produced, and their effects) and the
fact that some species cause problems when they bloom while others cause problems
at low cell densities.
State, federal, and academic programs collect most existing data, such as those
in the database maintained by the Florida Marine Research Institute,
for specific purposes (e.g., research or mitigation) or for specific
locations (e.g., the west coast of Florida) where HABs have caused
problems in the past. Thus, there is little consistency among programs,
and there is no mechanism in place to establish regional or national
databases. Both the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA; http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/col/projects/habs/index.html)
and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA; http://es.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/02ecohab.html)
have initiated efforts to address these problems, and the U.S. Global
Ocean Observation System Program, in collaboration with the Southern
Association of Marine Laboratories and the Gulf of Mexico Program,
is developing a prototype system for the northern Gulf of Mexico
(http://www.hpl.umces.edu/projects/HABSOS.pdf).
In addition, the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act was
enacted in 1998 (PL 105-383) in response to concerns that HABs and related environmental
events (e.g., hypoxia, fish kills) are increasingly a threat to human and coastal
ecosystem health. The act called for the establishment of an interagency task
force on HABs and hypoxia; a national assessment of HABs and hypoxia; and an
assessment plan for the Gulf of Mexico. A federal interagency task force released
the National Assessment of Harmful Algal Blooms in US Waters in October 2000
(http://www.habhrca.noaa.gov/FinalHABreport.pdf).
|