|
PROPOSED
MEASURES: RECREATION & OTHER USES
|
Recreation visitor-days
in forests, because recreation is a major use of forest lands in
the United States. (Fig. 1)
Access to forests
for recreation, as a measure of how available and how close recreational
lands are to the people wishing to use them. (Fig. 2)
Effects of
recreation on forests. Recreation, like other forest uses, may affect
forest condition (e.g., disturb wildlife, damage plants). (Fig. 3)
Total forest
cover in water supply regions, as a measure of the service that
forests provide in ensuring clean drinking water. The quality of water
produced in a watershed is related to the amount of forest cover. (Fig.
4)
Streamside
forest cover in water supply regions, also as a measure of the service
of forests in ensuring clean drinking water. The quality of water produced
in a watershed is related to the degree to which stream banks are forested.
(Fig. 5)
Public and private
forest lands are used by large numbers of people for recreation, but
no accurate estimates of use are available.
The amount of public
forest land per person is much greater in the West than in the East.
Alaska has vastly more public forest land per person than do the lower
48 states.
| Recreation
In Forests (Visitor Days) (1)
|
Acres
Of Public Forest Land Per 1,000 People* (2)
Technical
Note |
 |
 |
| The
Forest Service estimates that National Forest lands (which include
forested and nonforested areas) alone are used for hundreds of millions
of visitor-days each year. Forests owned by states, counties, and
municipalities are also heavily used. |
SOURCE:
USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory & Monitoring |
Effects
Of Recreation On Forests (3)
|
Forest
Cover In Public Water Supply Watersheds (4)
Technical
Note |
 |
 |
| There
is concern that heavy recreational use may disrupt bird and wildlife
nesting, breeding, and other activities; damage plants; or change
the quality of recreational experiences. |
| |
This map is
from a case study; the shaded portions are areas that provide surface
water for public water supplies in Massachusetts. Darker areas have
a higher percentage of forest cover. More than 70 percent of the
area that provides Massachusetts with surface water for drinking
is forested. Water quality is generally better when a greater percentage
of a watershed is forested (See the case study at Forests:
Nutrients, Fig. 3). |
| Streamside
Forest Cover In Public Water Supply Watersheds (5) |
 |
|
STATUS
OF DATA & OTHER NOTES
|
No consistent
or comprehensive national information is available regarding (1)
access to, or restriction of, private land for recreation; (2)
effects of recreation on forest condition; (3) total amount of
forest cover; or (4) amount of streamside forest cover in watersheds
providing drinking water. Satellite data could be used to report
on total forest cover and streamside forest cover.
Improved
estimates of the use of federal lands for recreation are being
developed and will be included in future reports.
Please see
the Technical
Notes at the back of this book for additional information.
|
|